Secondary legal relations as the special type of legal relations

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

In this article, the author, from the standpoint of a general legal approach, defines the essence of such a legal structure as a “second legal relationship”, which in the conceptual aspect is largely not developed, and the points of view available regarding its legal nature belong exclusively to civil law science. In the course of the study, using the comparative method, special signs of a second legal relationship are revealed by comparing them with the signs of a classical legal relationship.

In addition, the author based on the existing classification of legal relations on the basis of the dependence of one legal relationship on another, in the context of the consideration of secondary legal relations, new types of legal relations are proposed (linear derivative, indirect derivative, inverse derivative), and the place of secondary legal relations is clarified when dividing legal relations depending on the implemented function of the right into static and dynamic, among which it is proposed to distinguish dynamic neutral, dynamic positive, dynamic negative. As the main conclusion on the work, along with others, is the conclusion about the general legal nature of the second legal relationship, the features of which are the derivation from the main legal relationship and the transformative potential leading to a change in the legal sphere of behavior counterparty of a secondarily authorized person.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Vadim Kramskoy

Tambov Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Tambov State Technical University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: vkramskoy@mail.ru

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal disciplines, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Deputy Head of the Legal Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Tambov Region

Rússia, Tambov; Tambov

Bibliografia

  1. Alekseev S. S. General theory of law: in 2 vols. M., 1982. Vol. II. P. 122 (in Russ.).
  2. Babaev A. B. On the legal nature of secondary rights // North Caucasian Legal Herald. 2006. No. 2. P. 85 (in Russ.).
  3. Bogatyrev F. O. Secundary law on the example of the decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Russia // Journal of Russ. law. 2005. No. 2 (98). P. 69 (in Russ.).
  4. Bratus S. N. Subjects of Civil Law. M., 1950. P. 7 (in Russ.).
  5. Voplenko N. N. Legal relations: concept and classification // Herald of the Volgograd State University. Ser. 5: Jurisprudence. 2003. No. 6. Pp. 79, 80 (in Russ.).
  6. Vorms A. E. Bill forms. M., 1914. P. 19 (in Russ.).
  7. Gambarov Yu. S. Civil Law. General part / ed. by V. A. Tomsinov. M., 2003. P. 115 (in Russ.).
  8. Civil Law: actual problems of theory and practice / under the general editorship of V. A. Belov. M., 2007. Pp. 244, 245, 252 (in Russ.).
  9. Grevtsov Yu. I. Legal relations and the exercise of law. L., 1987. P. 57 (in Russ.).
  10. Zekkel E. Secundary rights in Civil Law // Herald of Civil Law. 2007. No. 2. Pp. 205–252 (in Russ.).
  11. Ivanova S. A. On the question of the concept of second rights and legal relations // The power of law. 2010. No. 2 (2). P. 45 (in Russ.).
  12. Karnushin V. E. Secondary rights in the Civil Law of the Russian Federation: general questions of theory, secondary rights in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation / ed. by V. P. Kamyshansky. M., 2016. P. 13 (in Russ.).
  13. Konshakov V. M. The use of potestative rights for the legal regulation of labor relations // Herald of the SPbU. Ser. 14. 2015. Iss. 1. P. 101 (in Russ.).
  14. Kravchenko A. A. On the question of the concept of seconda-ry law // Public and Private Law. 2015. No. 3 (27). P. 208 (in Russ.).
  15. Kramskoy V. V. Constructions “infinitive law”, “secondary law”, “potestative law” in the context of a new classification of subjective rights // State and Law. 2022. No. 11. P. 187 (in Russ.).
  16. Krasheninnikov E. A. On the theory of the right to a claim. Yaroslavl, 1995. P. 8 (in Russ.).
  17. Milkov A. V. On the issue of the protective nature of secondary legal relations // Russ. Justice. 2017. No. 10 (138). P. 51 (in Russ.).
  18. Tolstoy Yu. K. On the theory of legal relations. L., 1959. Pp. 5, 35, 194 (in Russ.).
  19. Tretyakov S. V. Formation of the concept of secondary rights in the German civil doctrine (For publication of the Russian translation of E. Zeckel’s work “Secondary rights in Civil Law”) // Herald of Civil Law. 2007. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 253 (in Russ.).
  20. Frolov A. I. Accessory as an effect of the functional derivative of civil law relations // Herald of the Tomsk State University. Law. 2018. No. 29. P. 197 (in Russ.).
  21. Khalfina R. O. General doctrine of legal relations. M., 1974. Pp. 231, 246 (in Russ.).
  22. Tuhr A. von. Tradato de las Obligaciones. Granada, 2007. P. 7.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024