Email this article 
On the scientific comprehension of the subject of constitutional law: to putting the question
- Authors: Cherepanov V.A.
- Issue: No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 130-140
- Section: Discussions and debates
- URL: https://vestnikugrasu.org/1026-9452/article/view/649033
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224010129
- ID: 649033
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
An attempt to putting the question of scientific comprehension of the subject of Constitutional Law, with highlighting of three parts was made: content of the subject of Constitutional Law in its historical development; method of comprehension of content using the ascent from the abstract to concrete; the starting point of the ascent, as determined by the philosophical category “relation”. The detailed consideration of the question posed and the formation of a holistic view of the subject of Constitutional Law are possible only through the efforts of the entire constitutional legal community within the framework of a broad discussion on the subject of Constitutional Law, which is long overdue.
Keywords
constitution, subject of Constitutional Law, social relation, philosophical category relation, scientific comprehension of the subject of Constitutional Law, abstract and concrete, ascent from the abstract to concrete, content and method of scientific investigation, starting point of the ascent, system integration of knowledge on the subject of Constitutional Law
Full Text
About the authors
Viktor A. Cherepanov
Author for correspondence.
Email: sigma45@yandex.ru
Doctor of Law, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation, StavropolReferences
- Avakyan S. A. Constitutional Law of Russia: training course: study guide: in 2 vols. 7th ed., reprint and add. M., 2023. Vol. 1. Pp. 23, 34 (in Russ.).
- Alexandrov G. F. Aristotle’s doctrine of the categories of being // Aristotle. Categories. M., 1939. P. XI (in Russ.).
- Alekseev S. S. General theory of law. M., 2008. P. 332 (in Russ.).
- Aristotle. Categories. M., 1939. P. 6 (in Russ.).
- Asmus V. F. Ancient philosophy. M., 1976. Pp. 352–360 (in Russ.).
- Baglay M. V. Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation: textbook. 14th ed., rev. and add. M., 2023. Pp. 17–20 (in Russ.).
- Batishchev G. S. Contradiction as a category of dialectical logic. M., 1963. Pp. 108–114 (in Russ.).
- Vygotsky L. S. Thinking and speech. Psychological research. M. – L., 1934. Pp. 4–15 (in Russ.).
- Hegel G. V.F. The science of logic: in 3 vols. M., 1970. Vol. 1. Pp. 91, 95, 124, 126–129; 1972. Vol. 3. Pp. 306, 307 (in Russ.).
- Hegel G. V.F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 1. The Science of Logic. M., 1974. Pp. 210, 217 (in Russ.).
- Zinoviev A. A. Ascent from the abstract to the concrete (based on the material of K. Marx’s Capital). M., 2002. Pp. 49, 52 (in Russ.).
- Ilyenkov E. V. Dialectical logic: essays on history and theory. M., 1984 (in Russ.).
- Kozlova E. I. Selected works: collection of articles, lectures, abstracts. M., 2017. P. 68 (in Russ.).
- Kutafin O. E. The subject of Constitutional Law. M., 2001. Pp. 9–35 (in Russ.).
- Lazarev V. V. Ideology of constitutional reform of the legal system of the Russian Federation // Journal of Russ. law. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 4. Pp. 5–17 (in Russ.).
- Lenin V. I. The complete works. Vol. 29. P. 318 (in Russ.).
- Marx K., Engels F. Essays. 2nd ed. Vol. 23. Pp. 6, 43; vol. 46. Part I. Pp. 37, 38 (in Russ.).
- Marxist philosophy in the XIX century. M., 1979. Book one. Pp. 453, 454 (in Russ.).
- Motroshilova N. V. Hegel’s path to the “Science of Logic”. M., 1984. P. 241 (in Russ.).
- Novoselov M. M. Abstraction in the labyrinths of knowledge. M., 2010 (in Russ.).
- Parsons T. On the structure of social action. M., 2018. P. 49 (in Russ.).
- Popper K. Logic and the growth of scientific knowledge. Selected works / transl. from English; comp., general ed. and the introduction of V. N. Sadovsky. M., 1983. Pp. 62–65 (in Russ.).
- Popper K. Objective knowledge. The evolutionary approach. M., 2002. P. 252 (in Russ.).
- Rosenthal M. M. The dialectic of “Capital” by K. Marx. 2nd ed., add. and rev. M., 1967. P. 191 (in Russ.).
- Serkov P. P. Legal relationship (Theory and practice of modern legal regulation). Part one. Facets of the legal unknown M., 2019. Pp. 38–95 (in Russ.).
- Heidegger M. Being and time. M., 1997. Pp. 2–8 (in Russ.).
- Chanyshev A. N. Aristotle. M., 1987. P. 63 (in Russ.).
- Chanyshev A. N. Course of lectures on ancient philosophy. M., 1981. P. 293 (in Russ.).
- Shvyrev V. S. Analysis of scientific knowledge: the main directions, forms, problems. M., 1988. P. 73 (in Russ.).
- Shchedrovitsky G. P. Selected works. M., 1995. Pp. 634–666 (in Russ.).
- Ebzeev B. S. Constitutional Law of Russia: textbook. M., 2019. P. 34 (in Russ.).
- Ebzeev B. S. The subject of Constitutional Law: historicity of content and development trends // State and Law. 2019. No. 7. Pp. 54–67 (in Russ.).
Supplementary files
Supplementary Files
Action
1.
JATS XML
2.
Fig. 1. Correlation of different ideas about the subject of constitutional law
Download (58KB)
3.
Fig. 2. System integration of knowledge in the process of ascent
Download (84KB)
4.
Fig. 3. The working structure of the subject of constitutional law
Download (43KB)
5.
Fig. 4. Attitude as the initial cell of scientific understanding of the subject of constitutional law
Download (40KB)
