Reaction of hydroiodic acid with a chlorine atom in the temperature range of 298–366 K
- Authors: Larin I.K.1, Pronchev G.B.1, Trofimova E.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 44, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 49-55
- Section: Kinetics and mechanism of chemical reactions, catalysis
- URL: https://vestnikugrasu.org/0207-401X/article/view/683913
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X25050066
- ID: 683913
Cite item
Abstract
In this study, the rate constant of the reaction between hydroiodic acid and a chlorine atom was measured using the resonance fluorescence (RF) method in a flow reactor within the temperature range of 298–366 K. Measurements were performed by detecting the RF of both chlorine atoms and iodine atoms, the latter being a product of this reaction. In both cases, similar expressions describing the temperature dependence of the rate constant were obtained. A possible explanation for the observed decrease in the reaction rate constant with increasing temperature in the reactor is proposed.
Full Text

About the authors
I. K. Larin
Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eltrofimova@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
G. B. Pronchev
Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: eltrofimova@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
E. M. Trofimova
Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: eltrofimova@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Larin I.K. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 16. № 3. P. 492. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122030083
- Golyak I.S., Anfimov D.R., Vintaykin I.B. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. № 2. P. 320. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123020264
- Golubkov G.V., Adamson S.O., Borchevkina O.P. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 16. № 3. P. 508. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122030058
- Rodionov A.I., Rodionov I.D., Rodionova I.P. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. № 5. P. 1246. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123050275
- Larin I.K., Belyakova T.I., Messineva N.A. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. № 2. P. 510. https://doi.org/10.1134/S199079312302029X
- Larin I.K., Pronchev G.B., Trofimova E.M. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2024. V. 18. № 3. P. 830. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793124700209
- Davis D., Crawford J., Liu S. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1996. V. 101. P. 2135. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02727
- Calvert J.G., Lindberg S.E. // Atmos. Environ. 2004. V. 38. № 30. P. 5105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.050
- Bloss W.J., Lee J.D., Johnson G.P. et al. // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005. V. 32. № 6. L06814. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022084
- Saiz-Lopez A., Plane J.M.C., Mahajan A.S. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008. V. 8. № 4. P. 887. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-887-2008
- Saiz-Lopez A., Plane J.M.C., Baker A.R. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2012. V. 112. P. 1773. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200029u
- Sherwen T., Evans M.J., Carpenter L.J. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016. V. 16. P. 1161. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1161-2016
- McFiggans G. // Nature. 2005. V. 433. № 7026. E13. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03372
- Martino M., Mills G.P., Woetjen J. et al. // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009. V. 36. № 1. L01609. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036334
- Lai S.C., Williams J., Arnold S.R. et al. // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011. V. 38. № 20. L20801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049035
- Cuevas C.A., Maffezzoli N., Corella J.P. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2018. V. 9. 1452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03756-1
- Carpenter L.J., MacDonald S.M., Shaw M.D. et al. // Nat. Geosci. 2013. V. 6. P. 108. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1687
- Larin I.K., Spasskii A.I., Trofimova E.M. et al. // Kinet Catal. 2007. V. 48. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023158407010016
- Behnke W., Zetsch C. // J. Aerosol. Sci. 1989. V. 20. № 8. P. 1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(89)90788-X
- Larin I.K. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. № 1. P. 244. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123010074
- Larin I.K., Pronchev G.B., Trofimova E.M. // Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 2024. V. 60. P. 225. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433824700178
- Kikoin I.K. Tables of physical quantities. Мoscow: Atomizdat, 1976 [in Russian].
- Wodarczyk F.J., Moore C.B. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974. V. 26. № 4. P. 484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(74)80396-9
- Mei C.C., Moore C.B. // J. Chem. Phys. 1977. V. 67. № 9. P. 3936. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.435409
- Yuan J., Misra A., Goumri A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2004. V. 108. № 33. P. 6857. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047411c
- Sayin H., McKee M.L. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2004. V. 108. № 37. P. 7613. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0479116
- Nakano J., Enamy S., Nakamichi S. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2003. V. 107. № 33. P. 6381. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0345147
- Arsene C., Barnes I., Becker K.H. et al. // Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2005. V. 37. P. 66. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20051
- Larin I.K., Spasskii A.I., Trofimova E.M. et al. // Kinet Catal. 2003. V. 44. № 2. P. 202. https://doi.org/10.1134/s002315841003003
- Larin I.K., Spasskii A.I., Trofimova E.M. et al. // Kinet Catal. 2010. V. 51. № 3. P. 348. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023158410030031
- Larin I.K., Spasskii A.I., Trofimova E.M. // Izv. RAN. Energetika. 2012. № 3. P. 44.
- Larin I.K., Spasskii A.I., Trofimova E.M. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2020. V. 14. № 5. P. 781. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793120050231
Supplementary files
