Kinetic Characteristics of Urotropine Gasification in Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide Flows
- Authors: Salgansky E.A.1, Glushkov D.O.2, Salganskaya M.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Russia
- National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
- Issue: Vol 42, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 58-62
- Section: Combustion, explosion and shock waves
- URL: https://vestnikugrasu.org/0207-401X/article/view/674892
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23030147
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NCSTBG
- ID: 674892
Cite item
Abstract
Based on the data of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), the kinetic characteristics of the thermal decomposition of urotropine in flows of N2 and CO2 are determined. The sample heating rates are 20, 60, and 90 K/min. The values of the kinetic rate constants of the decomposition of urotropine are determined by the Kissinger method. During gasification in nitrogen, the activation energy of the thermal decomposition of urotropine increases from 106 to 139 kJ/mol under conditions of an increase in the degree of conversion of the substance. The preexponential value also increases from 0.35 × 109 up to 145 × 109 s–1. The decomposition of urotropine proceeds by an exothermic reaction with a heat of 368, 339, and 275 kJ/kg for heating rates of 20, 60, and 90 K/min, respectively. During gasification in carbon dioxide, the activation energy of the thermal decomposition of urotropine first increases from 110 to 132 kJ/mol as the degree of conversion increases, and then decreases to 120 kJ/mol. The heat of decomposition of urotropine in a flow of CO2 is 382, 327, and 303 kJ/kg for heating rates of 20, 60, and 90 K/min, respectively.
About the authors
E. A. Salgansky
Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Russia
Email: sea@icp.ac.ru
Россия, Черноголовка
D. O. Glushkov
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
Email: sea@icp.ac.ru
Россия, Томск
M. V. Salganskaya
Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: sea@icp.ac.ru
Россия, Черноголовка
References
- Stepankova H., Swiatkowski M., Kruszynski R. et al. // Intern. J. Nanomed. 2021. V. 16. P. 4431; https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S304902
- Tseng K.W., Hsiao Y.P., Jen C.P. et al. // Sensors. 2020. V. 20. 2455; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092455
- Виткалова И.А., Торлова А.С., Пикалов Е.С. // Науч. обозрение. Техн. науки. 2017. № 2. С. 15.
- Третьяков А.О. // Хим. пром-сть. 2005. Т. 82. № 11. С. 551.
- Сапченко С.А., Барсукова М.О., Нохрина Т.В. и др. // Изв. АН. Сер. хим. 2020. № 3. С. 461.
- Воробьёв В.В. // Аграрная Россия. 2010. № 2. С. 2.
- Xie Q., Zhang L., Yu X. et al. // Propell. Explos. Pyrotech. 2020. V. 45. № 12. P. 1859; https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202000087
- Turhan H., Atalar T., Erdem N. et al. // Ibid. 2013. V. 38. № 5. P. 651; https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201200162
- Salganskaya M.V., Zaichenko A.Yu., Podlesniy D.N. et al. // Acta Astronaut. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.08.039
- Аврашков В.Н., Метёлкина Е.С., Мещеряков Д.В. // Физика горения и взрыва. 2010. Т. 46. № 4. С. 36.
- Селезнев Р.К. // Физ.-хим. кинетика в газ. динамике. 2014. Т. 15. № 3. С. 4.
- Салганский Е.А., Луценко Н.А. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 3. С. 68; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22030116
- Белобровина М.В., Сенюшкин Н.С. // Актуальные пробл. авиации и космонавтики. 2013. Т. 1. № 9. С. 47.
- Salgansky E.A., Lutsenko N.A. // Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2021. V. 109. 106420; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106420
- Фролов С.М., Иванов В.С. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 4. С. 68.
- Михалкин В.Н., Сумской С.И., Тереза А.М. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 8. С. 3; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X2208009X
- Юрьев Б.П., Дудко В.А. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 1. С. 17; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22010174
- Tereza A.M., Medvedev S.P., Smirnov V.N. // Acta Astronaut. 2021. V. 181. P. 612; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.09.048
- Гольдберг В.М., Ломакин С.М., Тодинова А.В. и др. // Изв. АН. Сер. хим. 2010. № 4. С. 790.
- Sieradzka M., Mlonka-Mędrala A., Magdziarz A. // Fuel. 2022. V. 330. 125566; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125566
- Жуйков А.В., Глушков Д.О. // ХТТ. 2022. № 5. С. 45.
- Назин Г.М., Дубихин В.В., Казаков А.И. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 1. С. 48; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22010125
- Shen H., Qiao H., Zhang H. // Chem. Eng. J. 2022. V. 450. 137905; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.137905
- Ramirez-Gutierrez C.F., Lujan-Cabrera I.A., Valencia-Molina L.D. et al. // Mater. Today Commun. 2022. V. 33. 104188; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104188
- Салганская М.В., Глазов С.В., Салганский Е.А. и др. // Хим. физика. 2008. Т. 27. № 1. С. 27.
- Rabinovich O.S., Malinouski A.I., Kislov V.M. et al. // Combust. Theor. Model. 2016. V. 20. № 5. P. 877; https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2016.1190034
- Miura K., Maki T. // Energy Fuels. 1998. V. 12. № 5. P. 864; https://doi.org/10.1021/ef970212q
- Zhang J., Wang Z., Zhao R. et al. // Energies. 2020. V. 13. 3313; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133313
- Zhang J., Chen T., Wu J. et al. // Roy. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2014. V. 4. 17513; https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra01445f
- Vyazovkin S. // Molecules. 2020. V. 25. 2813; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122813
- Rao G., Feng W., Zhang J. et al. // J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019. V. 135. № 4. P. 2447; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7359-8
- Peng H.L., Chen L.P., Lu G.B. et al. // Hanneng Cailiao/Chinese J. Energetic Mater. 2016. V. 24. № 5. P. 497; https://doi.org/10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2016.05.012
- Салганский Е.А., Фурсов В.П., Глазов С.В. и др. // Физика горения и взрыва. 2003. Т. 39. № 1. С. 44.
Supplementary files
