Hydrogen Evolution on Mechanically Synthesized Particles of Tungsten- and Iron-Based Carbides: WC, Fe 3 C, Fe 3 W 3 C, Fe 6 W 6 C

N. V. Lyalina; Лялина Н. В.; A. V. Syugaev; Сюгаев А. В.; M. A. Eryomina; Еремина М. А.; S. F. Lomayeva; Ломаева С. Ф.

doi:10.31857/S0044453723110213

Hydrogen Evolution on Mechanically Synthesized Particles of Tungsten- and Iron-Based Carbides: WC, Fe₃C, Fe₃W₃C, Fe₆W₆C

Authors: Lyalina N.V.¹, Syugaev A.V.¹, Eryomina M.A.¹, Lomayeva S.F.¹
Affiliations:
1. Udmurt Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 97, No 11 (2023)
Pages: 1638-1646
Section: ФИЗИЧЕСКАЯ ХИМИЯ НАНОКЛАСТЕРОВ, СУПРАМОЛЕКУЛЯРНЫХ СТРУКТУР И НАНОМАТЕРИАЛОВ
Submitted: 27.02.2025
Published: 01.11.2023
URL: https://vestnikugrasu.org/0044-4537/article/view/669175
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723110213
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OOBRFK
ID: 669175

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

The electrocatalytic activity of a number of mechanically activated/mechanically alloyed carbide phases of iron and tungsten and Fe3W3C and Fe6W6C bimetallic carbides in the evolution of hydrogen has been studied. Electrocatalysts have been prepared by compacting carbide particles with polyaniline as a conducting polymer. The highest activity is exhibited by Fe3C and WC nanocrystalline particles. Metallic phases in the composition of the particles slow down the rate of hydrogen evolution. Subsequent annealing of these particles transforms metallic phases to bimetallic carbides and accelerates the hydrogen evolution. The activity of the phases of Fe3W3C and Fe6W6C bimetallic carbides in the hydrogen evolution is fairly high, but they are inferior to the Fe3C and WC nanocrystalline particles.

Keywords

hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalytic activity, mechanical activation, mechanosynthesis, iron and tungsten carbides

References

Safizadeh F., Ghali E., Houlach G. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015. V. 40. P. 256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.109
Du Y., Zang M., Wang Z. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019. V. 7. P. 8602. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA00557A
Zhou M., Sun Q., Shen Y. et al. // Electochimica Acta. 2019. V. 306. P. 651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.160
Bentley C.L., Andronescu C., Smialkowski M. et al. // Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2018. V. 57. P. 4093. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201712679
Seo B., Jung G.Y., Kim J.H. et al. // Nanoscale. 2018. V. 10. P. 3839. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR08161H
Nguyen Q.T., Nguyen P.D., Nguyen D.N. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. V. 10. P. 8659. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18675
De Silva U., Masud J., Zhang N. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018. V. 6. P. 7608. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA01760C
Tang S., Zhang Z., Xiang J. et al. // Front. Chem. 2022. V. 10. P. 1073175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.1073175
Chen Y.-Y., Zhang Y., Jiang W.-J. et al. // ACS Nano. 2016. V. 10. P. 8851. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b04725
Yang C.C., Zai S.F., Zhou Y.T. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019. V. 29. P. 1901949. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201901949
Tang Y., Lan K., Li F., Jiang P. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. P. 9328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.115
Liu Y.-R., Hu W.-H., Li X. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016. V. 384. P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.007
Dong T., Zhang X., Cao Y. et al. // Inorg. Chem. Front. 2019. V. 6. P. 1073. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8QI01335G
Wang X.-L., Tang Y.-J., Huang W. et al. // ChemSusChem. 2017. V. 10. P. 2402. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201700276
Su J., Zhou J., Wang L. et al. // Sci. Bull. 2017. V. 62. P. 633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2016.12.011
Ma Y., Guan G., Hao X. et al. // Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017. V. 75. P. 1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.092
Ko Y.-J., Cho J.-M., Kim I. et al. // Appl. Catal. B. Environmental. 2017. V. 203. P. 684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.085
Ma Y.-Y., Lang Z.-L., Yan L.-K. et al. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2018. V. 11. P. 2114. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01129J
Song C., Wu S., Shen X. et al. // J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2018. V. 524. P. 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.026
Li S., Ren P., Yang C. et al. // Sci. Bull. 2018. V. 63. P. 1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.09.016
Болдырев В.В. // Успехи химии. 2006. Т. 73. № 3. С. 203. (Boldyrev V.V. // Russian Chemical Reviews. 2006. V. 75. № 3. P. 177). https://doi.org/10.1070/rc2006v075n03abeh001205
Syugaev A.V., Lyalina N.V., Lomayeva S.F. et al. // J. Solid State Electrochem. 2015. V. 19. P. 2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-015-2903-y
Syugaev A.V., Lyalina N.V., Lomayeva S.F. et al. // J. Solid State Electrochem. 2016. V. 20. P. 775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-015-3108-0
Wu Z., Fang B., Bonakdarpoun A. et al. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2012. V. 125. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.013
Ambrosi A., Chia X., Sofer Z. et al. // Electrochem. Commun. 2015. V. 54. P. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2015.02.017
Сюгаев А.В., Лялина Н.В., Ломаева С.Ф. и др. // Физикохимия поверхности и защита материалов. 2012. Т. 48. С. 429 (Syuagev A.V., Lyalina N.V., Lomayeva S.F. et al. // Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf. 2012. V. 48. P. 515). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205112050127
Сюгаев А.В., Ломаева С.Ф., Решетников С.М. // Физикохимия поверхности и защита материалов. 2010. Т. 46. С. 74 (Syuagev A.V., Lomayeva S.F., Reshetnikov S.M. // Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf. 2010. V. 46. P. 82). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205110010120
Shelekhov E.V., Sviridova T.A. // Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 2000. V. 42. P. 309. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471306
https://www.ill.eu/sites/fullprof/
Ломаева С.Ф. // ФММ. 2007. Т. 104. С. 403 (Lomayeva S.F. // Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2007. V. 104. P. 388). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X07100092